Sign up
Sign up
Let’s start off with my take on what leadership is, and what it means.
My definition: it’s the ability to authentically rally and enroll others in support of a course of action that the leader decides.
A few things I’ve learned in my travels:
It’s cliché, but it’s true. Anyone can lead. Senior executives, military commanders, politicians- all are expected to lead. It’s part of their job description. But many don’t. They are content to drift with tides, to come to meetings, to execute as a cog in a machine. Many simply leverage their position to order, command. They lean on hierarchy and systems of authority to get things done.
That’s not leadership.
Leadership happens when people take initiative and others follow. I know of so many amazing people that I’ve met in my career that are leaders in the informal sense. The people that others look to for advice and counsel. The ones that always end up making the suggestions that end up getting carried out. The ones that form the cultural nucleus of their team or department. The ones that so many other people respect.
I’ve seen so many people in executive roles that are ineffective leaders because they do not know how to build relationships of trust. They may know how to command a room, or look the part of a CEO, or talk tough- but when it comes down to it they fail to build trust with their teams, and then by extension, the organization.
Trust creates security, and security creates the conditions for people to lean in and take risks.
People want to be secure. They want to be heard and seen. They want to be respected. Leaders that make people feel those things build trust.
In my travels- there’s one type of leader that consistently stands out. These people know themselves, are aware of their strengths and weaknesses, are constantly looking to learn and grow, are comfortable in their own skin, and willing to take initiative and risk.
They treat others with respect. They are approachable. But they are also impressive. And that combination of skill plus humility draws people into their circle.
More Bob Iger, less Elon Musk. More Zelensky, less Putin.
This does not mean that other styles of leadership can’t be situationally effective (for instance, the leadership style during an acute turnaround is definitely going to need to be harder edged).
It also doesn’t mean that other styles of leadership can’t get amazing results (as Musk has proven again and again). But in my experience, this combination persistently works well for most contexts and allows an organization to attract and retain awesome people, which helps create a great culture.
Initial impressions can be flat out wrong. Boards frequently hire people into CEO roles that cut the part but are actually terrible leaders.
Sometimes it can take a lot of exposure and time to realize underlying issues like narcissism or insecurity that cripple decisions (you will often see people like this promote people they can control and alienate those that are more skilled but seen as less pliant).
For high stakes leadership decisions, deep psychological profiles are worth the investment.
Many great leaders are just born with it. But even if this doesn’t come naturally to you, many leadership traits can be built over time.
Practice: